Skip to main content

Deterrence (Strategy)

 Subject
Subject Source: Library of Congress Subject Headings

Found in 13 Collections and/or Records:

Arkland, Ezra H.: Escalation or brinkmanship, 1966

 File — Box 252, Folder: 1
Identifier: RG-13- File N420 .F82 1966 no.17
Dates: 1966

Bauer, Herbert: Deterrence : the role of the FBM, 1967

 File — Box 268, Folder: 3
Identifier: RG-13- File N420 .F82 1967 no.5
Dates: 1967

Blessing, George R.: Nuclear proliferation and the concept of deterrence, 1967

 File — Box 268, Folder: 6
Identifier: RG-13- File N420 .F82 1967 no.10
Dates: 1967

Confronting A Multipolar World: Deterrence, Arms Control, And Ballistic Missile Defense Revisited, 1991 Mar 31

 File — Box 6-39, Folder: 3
Identifier: RG-37
Abstract The end of the Cold War and the resultant collapse of the bipolar world order are resulting in the gradual emergence of regional Third World powers. America is left unchallenged as a global superpower, yet its national strategy must now adapt to deal with a certain degree of multipolarity based upon the regional power centers. The U.S. can achieve global security through of impellance. Impellance, which is proactive and forcible, replaces the entrenched bipolar Cold War national security strategy with a globally oriented one. The added strength of reliable alliances allows an impellant U.S. to lead a collective of nations which desire a new world order. Impellance addresses the need for increased protections against a rising ballistic missile threat in the Third World. Ballistic missile arsenals are viewed as regionally destabilizing, giving belligerent nations the ability to leapfrog over neutral or adjacent nations to inflict psychological and physical damage upon insulated states. Third World ballistic missile systems are rapidly improving through arms and technology transfers. Arms control efforts via impellent strategy, concentrating upon multiple aspects of the proliferation equation, provides both incentives and disincentives to slow the horizontal spread of technology and arms. Improved ranges and accuracies will still occur through indigenous regional improvements and natural technology transfers. Significantly improved anti-tactical ballistic missiles are needed...
Dates: 1991 Mar 31

Davis, Glenn A.: On strategic defense against nuclear attack, 1966

 File — Box 254, Folder: 16
Identifier: RG-13- File N420 .F8 1966 no.148
Dates: 1966

DeLong, Phillip C.: Deterrence - is not dispensable, 1967

 File — Box 269, Folder: 13
Identifier: RG-13- File N420 .F8 1967 no.13
Dates: 1967

Doyle, Lee T.: The relevance of the Gallois theories to French nuclear deterrent policy, 1968

 File — Box 281, Folder: 7
Identifier: RG-13- File N420 .F8 1968 no.46
Dates: 1968

Henderson, Eugene O'Brien: Intelligence : the ultimate deterrent, 1969

 File — Box 293, Folder: 11
Identifier: RG-13- File N420 .F8 1969 no.7
Dates: 1969

Hutchins, LaVern C.: The psycho-strategy of deterrence, 1969

 File — Box 294, Folder: 15
Identifier: RG-13- File N420 .F8 1969 no.41
Dates: 1969